Systematic Uncertainties in Black Hole Masses Determined from Single Epoch Spectra
Kelly D. Denney, Bradley M. Peterson, Matthias Dietrich, Marianne, Vestergaard, Misty C. Bentz

TL;DR
This study investigates the systematic errors affecting black hole mass estimates from single-epoch spectra of AGNs, emphasizing the impact of spectral quality, contamination, and line measurement techniques, and provides an error budget for these uncertainties.
Contribution
The paper systematically analyzes sources of error in single-epoch black hole mass measurements and offers guidelines to improve their accuracy and reliability.
Findings
Reliability drops for S/N below 10-20 per pixel.
Fitting line profiles can introduce systematic errors.
Minimum uncertainty due to variability is ~0.1 dex at high S/N.
Abstract
We explore the nature of systematic errors that can arise in measurement of black hole masses from single-epoch spectra of active galactic nuclei (AGNs) by utilizing the many epochs available for NGC 5548 and PG1229+204 from reverberation mapping databases. In particular, we examine systematics due to AGN variability, contamination due to constant spectral components (i.e., narrow lines and host galaxy flux), data quality (i.e., signal-to-noise ratio, S/N), and blending of spectral features by comparing the precision and accuracy of single-epoch mass measurements to those of recent reverberation mapping studies. We calculate masses by characterizing the broad Hbeta emission line by both the full width at half maximum and the line dispersion and demonstrate the importance of removing narrow emission-line components and host starlight. We find that the reliability of line width…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
