Evolution of magnetic fields in galaxies and future observational tests with the Square Kilometre Array
Tigran G. Arshakian, Rainer Beck, Marita Krause, and Dmitry Sokoloff

TL;DR
This paper models the evolution of magnetic fields in galaxies using dynamo theory, predicting observable signatures for the Square Kilometre Array to test galaxy formation and magnetic field development over cosmic time.
Contribution
It presents a comprehensive evolutionary model of galactic magnetic fields incorporating dynamo theory and cosmological simulations, linking galaxy formation stages with magnetic field amplification.
Findings
Turbulent dynamo amplifies seed fields to microgauss levels within 10^8 years.
Regular magnetic fields of microgauss strength develop within 2 Gyr in Milky Way-like galaxies.
Field coherence scales depend on galaxy size and formation epoch, with predictions for future SKA observations.
Abstract
Aims. We investigate the cosmological evolution of large- and small-scale magnetic fields in galaxies in the light of present models of formation and evolution of galaxies. Methods. We use the dynamo theory to derive the timescales of amplification and ordering of magnetic fields in disk and puffy galaxies. Turbulence in protogalactic halos generated by thermal virialization can drive an efficient turbulent dynamo. Results from simulations of hierarchical structure formation cosmology provide a tool to develop an evolutionary model of regular magnetic fields coupled with galaxy formation and evolution. Results. The turbulent (small-scale) dynamo was able to amplify a weak seed magnetic field in halos of protogalaxies to a few muG strength within a few 10^8 yr. This turbulent field served as a seed to the mean-field (large-scale) dynamo. Galaxies similar to the Milky Way formed their…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
