Leptogenesis with an almost conserved lepton number
Takehiko Asaka, Steve Blanchet

TL;DR
This paper analyzes leptogenesis in a minimal seesaw model with two right-handed neutrinos, deriving formulas for the asymmetry and exploring the implications of lepton number breaking parameters on low-scale leptogenesis and collider signals.
Contribution
It provides a semi-analytical formula for leptogenesis in a simple two-RH neutrino model, highlighting the importance of high-energy phases and the size of lepton number breaking parameters.
Findings
High-energy phase must be non-zero for successful leptogenesis.
Lepton number breaking parameter _h must be relatively large, _h > 10^{-3} (normal hierarchy).
Leptogenesis is incompatible with observable RH neutrino signals at colliders.
Abstract
Seesaw models with a slightly broken lepton number symmetry can explain small neutrino masses, and allow for low-scale leptogenesis. We make a thorough analysis of leptogenesis within the simplest model with two right-handed (RH) neutrinos (or with N_3 decoupled). We obtain a semi-analytical formula for the final asymmetry in both supersymmetric and non-supersymmetric cases with a simple dependence on each parameter. The low-energy parameters factorize from the high-energy ones, and the high-energy phase must be non-zero. The role of the PMNS phases is carefully studied. Moreover, we find that the breaking parameter in the Yukawa coupling matrix must be relatively large, \epsilon_h > 10^{-3} for normal and 10^{-2} for inverted hierarchy. Therefore, leptogenesis in our simple model is incompatible with RH neutrino signals at future colliders or sizable lepton-flavor violation. The other…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
