Natural Image Coding in V1: How Much Use is Orientation Selectivity?
Jan Eichhorn, Fabian Sinz, Matthias Bethge

TL;DR
This study rigorously compares ICA and PCA for natural image coding in V1, finding minimal redundancy reduction advantage for orientation-selective filters, suggesting orientation selectivity may not be crucial for redundancy reduction.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis showing that ICA offers little advantage over PCA in redundancy reduction, challenging the idea that orientation selectivity is essential for this purpose.
Findings
ICA's redundancy reduction advantage is surprisingly small.
A simple spherically symmetric model fits the data better than ICA.
Orientation selectivity is unlikely to be critical for redundancy reduction.
Abstract
Orientation selectivity is the most striking feature of simple cell coding in V1 which has been shown to emerge from the reduction of higher-order correlations in natural images in a large variety of statistical image models. The most parsimonious one among these models is linear Independent Component Analysis (ICA), whereas second-order decorrelation transformations such as Principal Component Analysis (PCA) do not yield oriented filters. Because of this finding it has been suggested that the emergence of orientation selectivity may be explained by higher-order redundancy reduction. In order to assess the tenability of this hypothesis, it is an important empirical question how much more redundancies can be removed with ICA in comparison to PCA, or other second-order decorrelation methods. This question has not yet been settled, as over the last ten years contradicting results have been…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
