Stability of a metric f(R) gravity theory implies the Newtonian limit

TL;DR

This paper demonstrates that in metric f(R) gravity theories, the stability of the ground state guarantees the existence of a Newtonian limit, but this does not serve as a unique criterion to select the correct gravity theory.

Contribution

It proves that stability of the ground state in metric f(R) gravity implies the Newtonian limit, challenging the use of this limit as a selection criterion for gravity theories.

Findings

Stability of the ground state ensures the Newtonian limit in f(R) gravity.

The Newtonian limit is either strict or approximate depending on the ground state.

f(R) gravity with stable ground states behaves similarly to GR with arbitrary Lambda.

Abstract

We show that the existence of the Newtonian limit cannot work as a selection rule for choosing the correct gravity theory fromm the set of all L=f(R) ones. To this end we prove that stability of the ground state solution in arbitrary purely metric f(R) gravity implies the existence of the Newtonian limit of the theory. And the stability is assumed to be the fundamental viability criterion of any gravity theory. The Newtonian limit is either strict in the mathematical sense if the ground state is flat spacetime or approximate and valid on length scales smaller than the cosmological one if the ground state is de Sitter or AdS space. Hence regarding the Newtonian limit a metric f(R) gravity does not differ from GR with arbitrary Lambda. This is exceptional to Lagrangians solely depending on R and/or Ricci tensor. An independent selection rule is necessary.