Blind and non-blind source detection in WMAP 5-year maps
M. Massardi, M. L\'opez-Caniego, J.Gonz\'alez-Nuevo, D. Herranz, G. De, Zotti, and J. L. Sanz

TL;DR
This study compares blind and non-blind source detection methods using WMAP 5-year maps, demonstrating their complementarity, assessing detection completeness, flux accuracy, and expanding the known source catalog.
Contribution
It introduces a combined detection approach that enhances source catalog completeness and provides a detailed analysis of flux estimation accuracy in microwave maps.
Findings
Blind and non-blind methods detect complementary sources.
Flux estimates are unbiased but affected by Eddington bias near detection limits.
The NEWPS_5yr catalog includes 484 sources with SNR>5.
Abstract
We have analyzed the efficiency in source detection and flux density estimation of blind and non-blind detection techniques exploiting the MHW2 filter applied to the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) 5-year maps. A comparison with the AT20G Bright Source Sample (Massardi et al. 2008), with a completeness limit of 0.5 Jy and accurate flux measurements at 20 GHz, close to the lowest frequency of WMAP maps, has allowed us to assess the completeness and the reliability of the samples detected with the two approaches, as well as the accuracy of flux and error estimates, and their variations across the sky. The uncertainties on flux estimates given by our procedure turned out to be about a factor of 2 lower than the rms differences with AT20G measurements, consistent with the smoothing of the fluctuation field yielded by map filtering. Flux estimates were found to be essentially…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
