An Improved Method for Using MgII to Estimate Black Hole Masses in Active Galactic Nuclei
Christopher A. Onken (1,2), Juna A. Kollmeier (3) ((1) Herzberg, Institute of Astrophysics, (2) Australian National University, (3) Carnegie, Observatories)

TL;DR
This paper introduces an improved method for estimating black hole masses in active galactic nuclei using the MgII emission line, correcting for biases and validating its accuracy across a broad redshift range.
Contribution
The authors develop a correction technique for MgII-based black hole mass estimates, enhancing their reliability and extending their applicability to higher redshifts.
Findings
MgII-based masses can be corrected for Eddington ratio dependence.
The intrinsic Eddington ratio distribution remains narrow (~0.3-0.4 dex).
The method increases the dispersion slightly but maintains overall accuracy.
Abstract
We present a method for obtaining accurate black hole (BH) mass estimates from the MgII emission line in active galactic nuclei (AGNs). Employing the large database of AGN measurements from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) presented by Shen et al., we find that AGNs in the redshift range 0.3-0.9, for which a given object can have both H-beta and MgII line widths measured, display a modest but correctable discrepancy in MgII-based masses that correlates with the Eddington ratio. We use the SDSS database to estimate the probability distribution of the true (i.e., H-beta-based) mass given a measured MgII line width. These probability distributions are then applied to the SDSS measurements from Shen et al. across the entire MgII-accessible redshift range (0.3-2.2). We find that accounting for this residual correlation generally increases the dispersion of Eddington ratios by a small…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
