Comparison of Different Pairing Fluctuation Approaches to BCS-BEC Crossover
K. Levin, Qijin Chen, Chih-Chun Chien, Yan He

TL;DR
This paper reviews and compares two main theoretical approaches to the BCS-BEC crossover in ultracold Fermi gases, highlighting their differences, strengths, weaknesses, and potential for integration.
Contribution
It provides a detailed comparison of NSR-based and BCS-Leggett approaches, emphasizing their distinct treatments of fermionic and bosonic contributions in the crossover.
Findings
NSR approach emphasizes bosonic contributions but treats fermions as quasi-free.
BCS-Leggett approach emphasizes fermionic contributions but treats bosons as quasi-free.
Both approaches have unique strengths and weaknesses that need to be integrated for a complete understanding.
Abstract
The subject of BCS - Bose Einstein condensation (BEC) crossover is particularly exciting because of its realization in ultracold Fermi gases and its possible relevance to high temperature superconductors. In the paper we review that body of theoretical work on this subject which represents a natural extension of the seminal papers by Leggett and by Nozieres and Schmitt-Rink (NSR). The former addressed only the ground state, now known as the "BCS-Leggett" wave-function and the key contributions of the latter pertain to calculations of the superfluid transition temperature . These two papers have given rise to two main and, importantly, distinct, theoretical schools in the BCS-BEC crossover literature. The first of these extends the BCS-Leggett ground state to finite temperature and the second extends the NSR scheme away from both in the superfluid and normal phases. It is now…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
