Falsifying Paradigms for Cosmic Acceleration
Michael J. Mortonson (KICP, University of Chicago), Wayne Hu (KICP,, University of Chicago), Dragan Huterer (University of Michigan)

TL;DR
This paper investigates the predictive power of consistency relations between cosmic growth and expansion observables for different dark energy models, using future supernova and CMB data to potentially falsify these models and explore alternative theories.
Contribution
It performs a comprehensive MCMC analysis of dark energy parametrizations to assess the robustness of predictions and the potential to falsify smooth dark energy models with upcoming data.
Findings
Percent-level predictions for LCDM with future data.
Most quintessence models predict a few percent variation.
Falsification of smooth dark energy would imply new paradigms.
Abstract
Consistency relations between growth of structure and expansion history observables exist for any physical explanation of cosmic acceleration, be it a cosmological constant, scalar field quintessence, or a general component of dark energy that is smooth relative to dark matter on small scales. The high-quality supernova sample anticipated from an experiment like SNAP and CMB data expected from Planck thus make strong predictions for growth and expansion observables that additional observations can test and potentially falsify. We perform an MCMC likelihood exploration of the strength of these consistency relations based on a complete parametrization of dark energy behavior by principal components. For LCDM, future SN and CMB data make percent level predictions for growth and expansion observables. For quintessence, many of the predictions are still at a level of a few percent with most…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
