Identification and Rejection of Fake Reconstructed Jets From a Fluctuating Heavy Ion Background in ATLAS
N. Grau (1), B. A. Cole (1), W. G. Holzmann (1), M. Spousta (2), P., Steinberg (3) (for the ATLAS Collaboration) ((1) Columbia University, Nevis, Laboratories, (2) Charles Univerisity, Faculty of Mathematics, Physics,, (3) Brookhaven National Laboratory)

TL;DR
This paper addresses the challenge of identifying and rejecting fake jets caused by background fluctuations in heavy ion collisions, proposing a new variable $ ext{Σ}j_{T}$ for effective fake jet suppression in ATLAS data analysis.
Contribution
Introduction of the $ ext{Σ}j_{T}$ variable to efficiently identify and reject fake reconstructed jets in heavy ion collision data, improving jet purity.
Findings
Fake jet rate exceeds binary-scaled p+p jet rate below 50 GeV
The $ ext{Σ}j_{T}$ variable reduces fake jets by a factor of 100
The method is effective regardless of jet energy profile modifications
Abstract
Full jet reconstruction in relativistic heavy ion collisions provides new and unique insights to the physics of parton energy loss. Because of the large underlying event multiplicity in collisions, random and correlated fluctuations in the background can result in the reconstruction of fake jets. These fake jets must be identified and rejected to obtain the purest jet sample possible. A large but reducible fake rate of jets reconstructed using an iterative cone algorithm on HIJING events is observed. The absolute rate of fake jets exceeds the binary-scaled p+p jet rate below 50 GeV and is not negligible until 100 GeV. The variable , the sum of the jet constituent's perpendicular to the jet axis, is introduced to identify and reject fake jets at by a factor of 100 making it negligible. This variable is shown to not strongly depend on jet energy profiles…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
