Spatial motion of the Magellanic Clouds. Tidal models ruled out?
Adam Ruzicka, Christian Theis, and Jan Palous

TL;DR
This study tests whether pure tidal models can explain the Magellanic Clouds' motion using new proper motion data, finding that such models are inconsistent with observations within current mass assumptions.
Contribution
The paper evaluates the viability of pure tidal models for the Magellanic System using updated proper motion data and a robust search algorithm, revealing their inadequacy.
Findings
Pure tidal models cannot reproduce HI data with new proper motions.
Optimal LMC proper motion component is > -1.3 mas/yr, about 40% lower than previous estimates.
Tidal models are incompatible with observed kinematics within current mass assumptions.
Abstract
Recently, Kallivayalil et al. derived new values of the proper motion for the Large and Small Magellanic Clouds (LMC and SMC, respectively). The spatial velocities of both Clouds are unexpectedly higher than their previous values resulting from agreement between the available theoretical models of the Magellanic System and the observations of neutral hydrogen (HI) associated with the LMC and the SMC. Such proper motion estimates are likely to be at odds with the scenarios for creation of the large-scale structures in the Magellanic System suggested so far. We investigated this hypothesis for the pure tidal models, as they were the first ones devised to explain the evolution of the Magellanic System, and the tidal stripping is intrinsically involved in every model assuming the gravitational interaction. The parameter space for the Milky Way (MW)-LMC-SMC interaction was analyzed by a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
