Outer-gap vs. Slot-gap Models for Pulsar High Energy Emissions: The Case of the Crab Pulsar
Kouichi Hirotani

TL;DR
This paper analytically compares outer-gap and slot-gap models for pulsar gamma-ray emissions, showing that the outer-gap model better reproduces observed fluxes in the Crab pulsar, with implications for understanding pulsar emission mechanisms.
Contribution
It introduces an analytical framework linking gamma-ray flux to pulsar parameters and evaluates the effectiveness of outer-gap and slot-gap models for the Crab pulsar.
Findings
Outer-gap model reproduces observed GeV fluxes.
Slot-gap model accounts for at most 20% of observed flux.
Gamma-ray flux proportional to spin-down flux and gap thickness cubed.
Abstract
We analytically examine the capabilities of rotation-powered pulsars as the sources of gamma-rays and show that their phase-averaged gamma-ray flux is proportional to the product of the spin-down flux and the gap trans-field thickness cubed irrespective of the emission models. Applying the scheme to the Crab pulsar, we demonstrate that the outer-gap model reproduces the observed GeV fluxes and that the slot-gap model reproduces at most twenty per cent of the observed fluxes because of the small trans-field thickness. An implication on the relationship between the gamma-ray and the spin-down fluxes is discussed.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
