Clustering of Dust-Obscured Galaxies at z ~ 2
Mark Brodwin, Arjun Dey, Michael J. I. Brown, Alexandra Pope, Lee, Armus, Shane Bussmann, Vandana Desai, Buell T. Jannuzi, and Emeric Le Floc'h

TL;DR
This study measures the clustering of dust-obscured galaxies at redshift around 2, revealing their strong clustering, luminosity dependence, and implications for galaxy evolution and halo masses.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed clustering analysis of DOGs at z~2, showing luminosity-dependent clustering and linking DOGs to galaxy evolution models.
Findings
Strong clustering with r_0 ≈ 7.4 Mpc/h for all DOGs
Luminosity-dependent clustering with brighter DOGs more clustered
Estimated halo masses suggest evolution into present-day galaxies or clusters
Abstract
We present the angular autocorrelation function of 2603 dust-obscured galaxies (DOGs) in the Bootes field of the NOAO Deep Wide-Field Survey. DOGs are red, obscured galaxies, defined as having R-[24] \ge 14 (F_24/F_R \ga 1000). Spectroscopy indicates that they are located at 1.5 \la z \la 2.5. We find strong clustering, with r_0 = 7.40^{+1.27}_{-0.84} Mpc/h for the full F_24 > 0.3 mJy sample. The clustering and space density of the DOGs are consistent with those of submillimeter galaxies, suggestive of a connection between these populations. We find evidence for luminosity-dependent clustering, with the correlation length increasing to r_0 = 12.97^{+4.26}_{-2.64} Mpc/h for brighter (F_24 > 0.6 mJy) DOGs. Bright DOGs also reside in richer environments than fainter ones, suggesting these subsamples may not be drawn from the same parent population. The clustering amplitudes imply average…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
