Direct factors of profinite completions and decidability
Martin R. Bridson

TL;DR
This paper investigates the relationship between finitely presented residually finite groups and their profinite completions, demonstrating the undecidability of determining direct factors within finite index subgroups.
Contribution
It introduces the concept that certain subgroups with isomorphic profinite completions are not necessarily direct factors, and proves the undecidability of identifying such factors.
Findings
Existence of subgroups with isomorphic profinite completions that are not direct factors
No algorithm can decide if a subgroup is a direct factor of a finite index subgroup
Profinite completion properties do not guarantee subgroup splitting
Abstract
We consider finitely presented,residually finite groups and finitely generated normal subgroups such that the inclusion induces an isomorphism from the profinite completion of to a direct factor of the profinite completion of . We explain why need not be a direct factor of a subgroup of finite index in ; indeed need not have a subgroup of finite index that splits as a non-trivial direct product. We prove that there is no algorithm that can determine whether is a direct factor of a subgroup of finite index in .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFinite Group Theory Research · Geometric and Algebraic Topology · Advanced Operator Algebra Research
