Long lived central engines in Gamma Ray Bursts
G. Ghisellini (INAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera, Merate, Italy)

TL;DR
This paper discusses the possibility that Gamma Ray Burst central engines remain active longer than the prompt emission phase, explaining various observed features through extended activity and fallback accretion.
Contribution
It proposes a model where long-lived central engines and fallback accretion account for diverse X-ray and optical afterglow behaviors in GRBs.
Findings
Extended central engine activity explains X-ray light curve features.
Late prompt emission from fallback accretion accounts for optical/X-ray diversity.
Decreasing Lorentz factor influences the observed break in the light curve.
Abstract
The central engine of Gamma Ray Bursts may live much longer than the duration of the prompt emission. Some evidence of it comes from the presence of strong precursors, post-cursors, and X-ray flares in a sizable fraction of bursts. Additional evidence comes from the fact that often the X-ray and the optical afterglow light curves do not track one another, suggesting that they are two different emission components. The typical "steep-flat-steep" behavior of the X-ray light curve can be explained if the same central engine responsible for the main prompt emission continues to be active for a long time, but with a decreasing power. The early X-ray "afterglow" emission is then the extension of the prompt emission, originating at approximately the same location, and is not due to forward shocks. If the bulk Lorentz factor Gamma is decreasing in time, the break ending the shallow phase can be…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
