Independent confirmation and refined parameters of the hot Jupiter XO-5b
A. P\'al (1,2,3), G. \'A. Bakos (1,4), J. Fernandez (1), B. Sip\H{o}cz, (2,1), G. Torres (1), D. W. Latham (1), G\'eza Kov\'acs (3), R. W. Noyes (1),, G. W. Marcy (5), D. A. Fischer (6), R. P. Butler (7), D. D. Sasselov (1), G., A. Esquerdo (1), A. Shporer (8), T. Mazeh (8)

TL;DR
This study confirms XO-5b as a hot Jupiter through extensive observations, refines its parameters, and rules out false positive scenarios, providing detailed insights into its physical and orbital characteristics.
Contribution
The paper provides independent confirmation of XO-5b's planetary nature and refines its parameters using new observational data, addressing previous uncertainties and potential false positives.
Findings
XO-5b's planetary parameters are consistent with previous estimates.
No significant stellar activity or transit timing variations detected.
XO-5b has a high Safronov number and surface gravity.
Abstract
We present HATNet observations of XO-5b, confirming its planetary nature based on evidence beyond that described in the announcement of Burke et al. (2008), namely, the lack of significant correlation between spectral bisector variations and orbital phase. In addition, using extensive spectroscopic measurements spanning multiple seasons, we investigate the relatively large scatter in the spectral line bisectors. We also examine possible blended stellar configurations (hierarchical triples, chance alignments) that can mimic the planet signals, and we are able to show that none are consistent with the sum of all the data. The analysis of the S activity index shows no significant stellar activity. Our results for the planet parameters are consistent with values in Burke et al. (2008), and we refine both the stellar and planetary parameters using our data. XO-5b orbits a slightly evolved,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
