Galactic secondary positron flux at the Earth
T. Delahaye (1,2), F. Donato (2), N. Fornengo (2), J. Lavalle (2), R., Lineros (2), P. Salati (1), R. Taillet (1). ((1) LAPTH/Annecy, CNRS-SPM and, Universite' de Savoie 9, (2) University of Torino, INFN/Torino)

TL;DR
This paper models the secondary positron flux produced by cosmic ray spallation, compares it with PAMELA data, and discusses implications for dark matter and cosmic ray physics, highlighting significant uncertainties and the potential for future constraints.
Contribution
It provides a detailed calculation of secondary positron flux with quantified uncertainties and analyzes the positron fraction data in relation to cosmic ray models and dark matter hypotheses.
Findings
Secondary positron flux can be well reproduced within uncertainties.
An excess in positron fraction may exist after accounting for uncertainties.
Future AMS-02 data will significantly constrain cosmic-ray transport models.
Abstract
Secondary positrons are produced by spallation of cosmic rays within the interstellar gas. Measurements have been typically expressed in terms of the positron fraction, which exhibits an increase above 10 GeV. Many scenarios have been proposed to explain this feature, among them some additional primary positrons originating from dark matter annihilation in the Galaxy. The PAMELA satellite has provided high quality data that has enabled high accuracy statistical analyses to be made, showing that the increase in the positron fraction extends up to about 100 GeV. It is therefore of paramount importance to constrain theoretically the expected secondary positron flux to interpret the observations in an accurate way. We find the secondary positron flux to be reproduced well by the available observations, and to have theoretical uncertainties that we quantify to be as large as about one order…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
