Upper Limits on the Masses of 105 Supermassive Black Holes from Hubble Space Telescope/Space Telescope Imaging Spectrograph Archival Data
A. Beifiori (1), M. Sarzi (2), E. M. Corsini (1), E. Dalla Bonta' (1),, A. Pizzella (1), L. Coccato (3), and F. Bertola (1) ((1) Dipartimento di, Astronomia, Universita' degli Studi di Padova, Italy,(2) Centre for, Astrophysics Research, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK

TL;DR
This study uses Hubble Space Telescope data to set upper limits on supermassive black hole masses in 105 nearby galaxies, revealing that most upper limits align with the known MBH-sigma relation and suggesting coevolution driven by dry mergers.
Contribution
It provides the largest set of SMBH upper limits derived from nebular line widths, extending the MBH-sigma relation analysis across diverse galaxy types and masses.
Findings
Most upper limits follow the MBH-sigma relation.
No significant trends with galaxy Hubble type or bars.
Flattening of the MBH-sigma relation at high sigma suggests coevolution via dry mergers.
Abstract
Based on the modeling of the central emission-line width measured over sub-arcsecond apertures with the Hubble Space Telescope, we present stringent upper bounds on the mass of the central supermassive black hole, MBH, for a sample of 105 nearby galaxies (D<100Mpc) spanning a wide range of Hubble types (E-Sc) and values of the central stellar velocity dispersion, sigma (58-419km/s). For the vast majority of the objects the derived MBH upper limits run parallel and above the well-known MBH-sigma relation independently of the galaxy distance, suggesting that our nebular line-width measurements trace rather well the nuclear gravitational potential. For values of sigma between 90 and 220km/s the 68% of our upper limits falls immediately above the MBH-sigma relation without exceeding the expected MBH values by more than a factor 4.1. No systematic trends or offsets are observed in this sigma…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
