Systematic Effective Field Theory Investigation of Spiral Phases in Hole-Doped Antiferromagnets on the Honeycomb Lattice
F.-J. Jiang, F. K\"ampfer, C. P. Hofmann, and U.-J. Wiese

TL;DR
This paper uses effective field theory to explore spiral magnetic phases in hole-doped antiferromagnets on the honeycomb lattice, revealing unique symmetry properties and phase preferences relevant to high-temperature superconductor precursors.
Contribution
It introduces a systematic low-energy effective field theory approach to analyze magnetic phases in honeycomb lattice antiferromagnets, highlighting differences from square lattice systems.
Findings
Spiral phases can form due to a single-derivative term in the effective action.
The preferred phase depends on low-energy parameters, favoring either homogeneous or spiral states.
Spirals are not constrained to lattice directions due to an accidental continuous rotational symmetry.
Abstract
Motivated by possible applications to the antiferromagnetic precursor of the high-temperature superconductor NaCoOyHO, we use a systematic low-energy effective field theory for magnons and holes to study different phases of doped antiferromagnets on the honeycomb lattice. The effective action contains a leading single-derivative term, similar to the Shraiman-Siggia term in the square lattice case, which gives rise to spirals in the staggered magnetization. Depending on the values of the low-energy parameters, either a homogeneous phase with four or a spiral phase with two filled hole pockets is energetically favored. Unlike in the square lattice case, at leading order the effective action has an accidental continuous spatial rotation symmetry. Consequently, the spiral may point in any direction and is not necessarily aligned with a lattice direction.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
