The Binarity of the Magellanic Clouds and the Formation of the Magellanic Stream
Gurtina Besla (Harvard), Nitya Kallivayalil (MIT), Lars Hernquist, (Harvard), Roeland P. van der Marel (STSci), T.J. Cox (Harvard), Brant, Robertson (Chicago), Charles Alcock (Harvard)

TL;DR
This study uses HST proper motion data to analyze the Magellanic Clouds' interaction history, concluding that the Magellanic Stream's formation is unlikely due to tidal forces alone, and suggesting ram pressure stripping as a plausible mechanism.
Contribution
It provides new constraints on the orbital history of the Magellanic Clouds and challenges the purely tidal origin hypothesis for the Magellanic Stream.
Findings
Binary L/SMC orbits consistent with observations
Tides alone cannot explain the Magellanic Stream's properties
Ram pressure stripping offers a natural explanation for the Stream's features
Abstract
The HST proper motion (PM) measurements of the Clouds have severe implications for their interaction history with the Milky Way (MW) and with each other. The Clouds are likely on their first passage about the MW and the SMC's orbit about the LMC is better described as quasi-periodic rather than circular. Binary L/SMC orbits that satisfy observational constraints on their mutual interaction history (e.g. the formation of the Magellanic Bridge during a collision between the Clouds ~300 Myr ago) can be located within 1 sigma of the mean PMs. However, these binary orbits are not co-located with the Magellanic Stream (MS) when projected on the plane of the sky and the line-of-sight velocity gradient along the LMC's orbit is significantly steeper than that along the MS. These combined results ultimately rule out a purely tidal origin for the MS: tides are ineffective without multiple…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
