Dominance, Intimidation, and `Choking' on the PGA Tour
Robert A. Connolly, Richard J. Rendleman Jr

TL;DR
This paper analyzes Tiger Woods' dominance and the psychological impact of playing with him on other golfers during 1998-2001, revealing Woods' exceptional performance and the intimidation effect on opponents.
Contribution
It quantifies Woods' dominance and the intimidation factor, and reevaluates Mickelson's performance in majors during the period.
Findings
Woods could have won or placed highly with average play.
Playing with Woods increased opponents' strokes by 0.462 per round.
Mickelson's major performance was better than press reports suggested.
Abstract
Extending the work of Connolly and Rendleman (2008), we document the dominance of Tiger Woods during the 1998-2001 PGA Tour seasons. We show that by playing "average," Woods could have won some tournaments and placed no worse than fourth in the tournaments in which he participated in year 2000, his best on the PGA Tour. No other PGA Tour player in our sample could have come close to such a feat. We also are able to quantify the intimidation factor associated with playing with Woods. On average, players who were paired with Woods during the 1998-2001 period scored 0.462 strokes per round worse than normal. Although we find that Woods' presence in a tournament may have had a small, but statistically significant adverse impact on the entire field, this effect was swamped by the apparent intimidation factor associated with having to play with Tiger side-by-side. We also demonstrate that…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSports Analytics and Performance · Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics · Gambling Behavior and Treatments
