Effect of Night Laboratories on Learning Objectives for a Non-Major Astronomy Class
Ian C. Jacobi, Heidi Jo Newberg, Darren Broder, Rose A. Finn, Anthony, J. Milano, Lee A. Newberg, Allan T. Weatherwax, and Douglas C. B. Whittet

TL;DR
This study evaluates the impact of night-time astronomy labs on non-major students' learning, showing significant improvement on specific moon phase objectives and exploring factors like weather and activity structure.
Contribution
Introduces a new assessment tool and investigates how weather and activity design influence learning outcomes in night labs.
Findings
Significant learning improvement on moon phase objectives (8.0 sigma)
Weak evidence of broader learning gains
Correlation between clear skies and overall achievement levels
Abstract
We tested the effectiveness on learning of hands-on, night-time laboratories that challenged student misconceptions in a non-major introductory astronomy class at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. We present a new assessment examination used to assess learning in this study. We were able to increase learning, at the 8.0 sigma level, on one of the moon phase objectives that was addressed in a cloudy night activity. There is weak evidence of some improvement on a broader range of learning objectives. We show evidence that the overall achievement levels of the four sections of the class is correlated with the amount of clear whether the sections had for observing, even though the learning objectives were addressed primarily in activities that did not require clear skies. This last result should be confirmed with future studies. We describe our first attempt to cycle the students through…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
