Progenitor mass of the type IIP supernova 2005cs
V.P. Utrobin (1, 2), N.N. Chugai (3) ((1) MPA, Garching; (2) ITEP,, Moscow; (3) Institute of Astronomy, RAS, Moscow)

TL;DR
This paper estimates the progenitor mass of supernova 2005cs using hydrodynamic modeling and compares it with pre-explosion observations, revealing systematic differences that suggest a need to revise current progenitor models for type IIP supernovae.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed hydrodynamic modeling of supernova 2005cs and compares the progenitor mass estimates with pre-explosion data, highlighting discrepancies in current methods.
Findings
Hydrodynamic modeling yields a progenitor mass of 18.2 Msun for SN 2005cs.
Hydrodynamic estimates tend to be higher than pre-explosion image estimates.
Systematic overestimation suggests a need to revise progenitor models for type IIP supernovae.
Abstract
The progenitor mass of type IIP supernova can be determined from either hydrodynamic modeling of the event or pre-explosion observations. To compare these approaches, we determine parameters of the sub-luminous supernova 2005cs and estimate its progenitor mass. We compute the hydrodynamic models of the supernova to describe its light curves and expansion velocity data. We estimate a presupernova mass of 17.3 Msun, an explosion energy of 4.1x10^{50} erg, a presupernova radius of 600 Rsun, and a radioactive Ni-56 mass of 0.0082 Msun. The derived progenitor mass of SN 2005cs is 18.2 Msun, which is in-between those of low-luminosity and normal type IIP supernovae. The obtained progenitor mass of SN 2005cs is higher than derived from pre-explosion images. The masses of four type IIP supernovae estimated by means of hydrodynamic modeling are systematically higher than the average progenitor…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
