Spectral hardness evolution characteristics of tracking Gamma-ray Burst pulses
Z. Y. Peng, L. Ma, R. J. Lu, L. M. Fang, Y. Y. Bao, Y. Yin

TL;DR
This study analyzes the spectral hardness evolution of tracking gamma-ray burst pulses, revealing consistent patterns of high initial $E_{peak}$ that decrease over time, supporting existing GRB models and suggesting a link to kinematic and dynamic processes.
Contribution
It provides a detailed statistical analysis of $E_{peak}$ evolution in tracking GRB pulses, confirming predicted patterns and offering constraints for GRB theoretical models.
Findings
$E_{peak}$ in rise phase starts high (median ~300 keV)
Decay phase ends at lower $E_{peak}$ (median ~200 keV)
Rise phase is shorter and spectrally harder than decay phase
Abstract
Employing a sample presented by Kaneko et al. (2006) and Kocevski et al. (2003), we select 42 individual tracking pulses (here we defined tracking as the cases in which the hardness follows the same pattern as the flux or count rate time profile) within 36 Gamma-ray Bursts (GRBs) containing 527 time-resolved spectra and investigate the spectral hardness, (where is the maximum of the spectrum), evolutionary characteristics. The evolution of these pulses follow soft-to-hard-to-soft (the phase of soft-to-hard and hard-to-soft are denoted by rise phase and decay phase, respectively) with time. It is found that the overall characteristics of of our selected sample are: 1) the evolution in the rise phase always start on the high state (the values of are always higher than 50 keV); 2) the spectra of rise phase clearly start…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
