Charged pion form factor between Q^2=0.60 and 2.45 GeV^2. II. Determination of, and results for, the pion form factor
G.M. Huber, H.P. Blok, T. Horn, E.J. Beise, D. Gaskell, D.J. Mack, V., Tadevosyan, J. Volmer, D. Abbott, K. Aniol, H. Anklin, C. Armstrong, J., Arrington, K. Assamagan, S. Avery, O.K. Baker, B. Barrett, C. Bochna, W., Boeglin, E.J. Brash, H. Breuer, C.C. Chang, N. Chant

TL;DR
This paper presents a detailed extraction of the charged pion form factor from Jefferson Lab data in the Q^2 range 0.60 to 2.45 GeV^2, highlighting model dependencies and comparing results with theoretical models to understand hadronic structure.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive methodology for extracting Fpi from electroproduction data, emphasizing the dominant uncertainties and comparing experimental results with various theoretical calculations.
Findings
Fpi values are below the monopole model above Q^2=1.5 GeV^2
Extraction method details and uncertainty analysis are provided
Comparison with theoretical models aids understanding of soft vs. hard contributions
Abstract
The charged pion form factor, Fpi(Q^2), is an important quantity which can be used to advance our knowledge of hadronic structure. However, the extraction of Fpi from data requires a model of the 1H(e,e'pi+)n reaction, and thus is inherently model dependent. Therefore, a detailed description of the extraction of the charged pion form factor from electroproduction data obtained recently at Jefferson Lab is presented, with particular focus given to the dominant uncertainties in this procedure. Results for Fpi are presented for Q^2=0.60-2.45 GeV^2. Above Q^2=1.5 GeV^2, the Fpi values are systematically below the monopole parameterization that describes the low Q^2 data used to determine the pion charge radius. The pion form factor can be calculated in a wide variety of theoretical approaches, and the experimental results are compared to a number of calculations. This comparison is helpful…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
