The clustering and abundance of star-forming and passive galaxies at $z \sim 2$
W. G. Hartley, K. P. Lane, O. Almaini, M. Cirasuolo, S. Foucaud, C., Simpson, S. Maddox, I. Smail, C. Conselice, R. J. McLure, J. S. Dunlop

TL;DR
This study analyzes the clustering and abundance of star-forming and passive galaxies at redshift around 2, revealing that passive galaxies are more strongly clustered and likely progenitors of massive present-day galaxies.
Contribution
It provides new measurements of galaxy clustering, number counts, and luminosity functions at z~2 using deep near-infrared and optical surveys, highlighting the strong clustering of passive galaxies.
Findings
Passive galaxies are more strongly clustered than star-forming ones.
Passive galaxies inhabit the most massive dark matter halos.
Only about 2.5% of current massive ellipticals had a passive BzK progenitor.
Abstract
We use the UKIDSS Ultra-deep survey (UDS), currently the deepest panoramic near infra-red survey, together with deep Subaru optical imaging to measure the clustering, number counts and luminosity function of galaxies at selected using the BzK selection technique. We find that both star-forming (sBzK) and passive (pBzK) galaxies, to a magnitude limit of , are strongly clustered. The passive galaxies are the most strongly clustered population, with scale lengths of hMpc compared with hMpc for star-forming galaxies. The direct implication is that passive galaxies inhabit the most massive dark-matter halos, and are thus identified as the progenitors of the most massive galaxies at the present day. In addition, the pBzKs exhibit a sharp flattening and potential turn-over in their number counts, in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
