Extragalactic Constraints on the Initial Mass Function
Stephen M. Wilkins, Andrew M. Hopkins, Neil Trentham, Rita Tojeiro

TL;DR
This paper examines whether a universal power-law initial mass function (IMF) can reconcile observed stellar mass densities with those predicted from the cosmic star formation history across different redshifts, finding limitations at higher redshifts.
Contribution
It demonstrates that a shallower high-mass slope in the IMF can match local stellar mass densities but fails at higher redshifts, highlighting constraints on universal IMFs.
Findings
A shallower IMF slope (2.15) aligns with local stellar mass density observations.
Higher redshift stellar mass densities are systematically lower than predictions for any universal power-law IMF.
Universal power-law IMFs cannot fully explain the observed evolution of stellar mass density.
Abstract
The local stellar mass density is observed to be significantly lower than the value obtained from integrating the cosmic star formation history (SFH), assuming that all the stars formed with a Salpeter initial mass function (IMF). Even other favoured IMFs, more successful in reconciling the observed stellar mass density with that inferred from the SFH, have difficulties in reproducing the stellar mass density observed at higher redshift. In this study we investigate to what extent this discrepancy can be alleviated for any universal power-law IMF. We find that an IMF with a high-mass slope shallower (2.15) than the Salpeter slope (2.35) reconciles the observed stellar mass density with the cosmic star formation history, but only at low redshifts. At higher redshifts we find that observed stellar mass densities are systematically lower than predicted from the cosmic star…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
