Inverse Compton gamma-ray models for remnants of Galactic type Ia supernovae?
H.J. Voelk (1), L.T. Ksenofontov (2), E.G. Berezhko (2) ((1), Max-Planck Institut fuer Kernphysik, Heidelberg, Germany, (2) Yu.G. Shafer, Institute of Cosmophysical Research, Aeronomy, Yakutsk, Russia)

TL;DR
This study investigates whether gamma-ray emissions from certain supernova remnants can be explained solely by electron acceleration, finding that magnetic field assumptions challenge this scenario and suggest the need for nuclear particle acceleration.
Contribution
It provides a theoretical analysis comparing inverse Compton gamma-ray models with observational limits, highlighting the necessity of magnetic field amplification and nuclear particle acceleration.
Findings
Standard magnetic fields overpredict gamma-ray flux.
Strong magnetic field amplification is required to match observations.
Nuclear particle acceleration likely plays a significant role.
Abstract
We theoretically and phenomenologically investigate the question whether the gamma-ray emission from the remnants of the type Ia supernovae SN 1006, Tycho's SN and Kepler's SN can be the result of electron acceleration alone. The observed synchrotron spectra of the three remnants are used to determine the average momentum distribution of nonthermal electrons as a function of the assumed magnetic field strength. Then the inverse Compton emission spectrum in the Cosmic Microwave Background photon field is calculated and compared with the existing upper limits for the very high energy gamma-ray flux from these sources. It is shown that the expected interstellar magnetic fields substantially overpredict even these gamma-ray upper limits. Only rather strongly amplified magnetic fields could be compatible with such low gamma-ray fluxes. However this would require a strong component of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
