COSMOS Photometric Redshifts with 30-bands for 2-deg2
O. Ilbert, P. Capak, M. Salvato, H. Aussel, H. J. McCracken, D. B., Sanders, N. Scoville, J. Kartaltepe, S. Arnouts, E. Le Floc'h, B. Mobasher,, Y. Taniguchi, F. Lamareille, A. Leauthaud, S. Sasaki, D. Thompson, M., Zamojski, G. Zamorani, S. Bardelli, M. Bolzonella, A. Bongiorno

TL;DR
This paper presents highly accurate photometric redshifts for the COSMOS field using 30-band data, improved by a new emission line contribution method, enabling detailed galaxy evolution studies up to redshift 2.
Contribution
Introduction of a novel emission line modeling approach that enhances photometric redshift accuracy by 2.5 times in a multi-band survey.
Findings
Photometric redshifts have a dispersion of 0.007 at bright magnitudes.
Accuracy extends to z~2 with a dispersion of 0.06 at faint magnitudes.
The catalog includes over 600,000 objects for galaxy evolution research.
Abstract
We present accurate photometric redshifts in the 2-deg2 COSMOS field. The redshifts are computed with 30 broad, intermediate, and narrow bands covering the UV (GALEX), Visible-NIR (Subaru, CFHT, UKIRT and NOAO) and mid-IR (Spitzer/IRAC). A chi2 template-fitting method (Le Phare) was used and calibrated with large spectroscopic samples from VLT-VIMOS and Keck-DEIMOS. We develop and implement a new method which accounts for the contributions from emission lines (OII, Hbeta, Halpha and Ly) to the spectral energy distributions (SEDs). The treatment of emission lines improves the photo-z accuracy by a factor of 2.5. Comparison of the derived photo-z with 4148 spectroscopic redshifts (i.e. Delta z = zs - zp) indicates a dispersion of sigma_{Delta z/(1+zs)}=0.007 at i<22.5, a factor of 2-6 times more accurate than earlier photo-z in the COSMOS, CFHTLS and COMBO-17 survey fields. At fainter…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
