Estimating intermittency in three-dimensional Navier-Stokes turbulence
J. D. Gibbon

TL;DR
This paper investigates the complexity of resolving three-dimensional Navier-Stokes turbulence, revealing that solutions exhibit distinct behaviors in different regions, with implications for understanding intermittency and computational challenges.
Contribution
It introduces a framework distinguishing regions with different turbulence behaviors and quantifies the local degrees of freedom needed for resolution based on Reynolds number.
Findings
Regions with high gradients correspond to vortex sheets or filaments.
The local degrees of freedom scale with the cube of the Reynolds number.
Different regions require different computational resolutions.
Abstract
The issue of why computational resolution in Navier-Stokes turbulence is so hard to achieve is addressed. It is shown that Navier-Stokes solutions can potentially behave differently in two distinct regions of space-time where is comprised of a union of disjoint space-time `anomalies'. Large values of dominate , which is consistent with the formation of vortex sheets or tightly-coiled filaments. The local number of degrees of freedom needed to resolve the regions in satisfies where is a Reynolds number dependent on the local velocity field .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
