Galaxies in a simulated $\Lambda$CDM Universe I: cold mode and hot cores
Du\v{s}an Kere\v{s} (1), Neal Katz (2), Mark Fardal (2), Romeel Dave, (3), David H. Weinberg (4) ((1) Harvard/CFA, (2) UMass, (3) U. of Arizona,, (4) Ohio-State)

TL;DR
This study uses cosmological simulations to analyze galaxy formation, confirming cold mode accretion as dominant in low-mass halos and revealing lower hot accretion rates in massive halos than previously thought, impacting galaxy evolution models.
Contribution
It provides new insights into the prevalence of cold and hot accretion modes in galaxy formation, especially highlighting lower hot accretion rates in massive halos in Gadget-2 simulations.
Findings
Cold mode accretion dominates in low-mass halos at all redshifts.
Hot accretion rates in massive halos are lower than earlier predictions.
Cooling times in hot gas halos are long, affecting galaxy growth.
Abstract
We study the formation of galaxies in a (50 Mpc/h)^3 cosmological simulation (2x288^3 particles), evolved using the entropy conserving SPH code Gadget-2. Most of the baryonic mass in galaxies of all masses is originally acquired through filamentary "cold mode" accretion of gas that was never shock heated to its halo virial temperature, confirming the key feature of our earlier results obtained with a different SPH code (Keres et al. 2005). Atmospheres of hot, virialized gas develop in halos above ~2.5e11 Msun, a transition mass that is nearly constant from z=3 to z=0. Cold accretion persists in halos above the transition mass, especially at z>=2. It dominates the growth of galaxies in low mass halos at all times, and it is the main driver of the cosmic star formation history. Satellite galaxies have accretion rates similar to central galaxies of the same baryonic mass at high redshifts,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
