An Assessment of the Systematic Uncertainty in Present and Future Tests of the Lense-Thirring Effect with Satellite Laser Ranging
Lorenzo Iorio

TL;DR
This paper critically assesses the systematic uncertainties in measuring the Lense-Thirring effect via Satellite Laser Ranging, highlighting that previous estimates may underestimate errors and exploring methods to improve measurement accuracy.
Contribution
It challenges the reliability of previous uncertainty evaluations and discusses alternative approaches and future prospects for achieving 1% measurement accuracy.
Findings
Uncertainty estimates based on model covariances are underestimated.
Differences in Earth's gravity models suggest larger systematic errors.
LARES's lower orbit increases sensitivity to Earth's geopotential variations.
Abstract
We deal with the attempts to measure the Lense-Thirring effect with the Satellite Laser Ranging (SLR) technique applied to the existing LAGEOS and LAGEOS II terrestrial satellites and to the recently approved LARES spacecraft.The first issue addressed here is: are the so far published evaluations of the systematic uncertainty induced by the bad knowledge of the even zonal harmonic coefficients J_L of the multipolar expansion of the Earth's geopotential reliable and realistic? Our answer is negative. Indeed, if the differences Delta J_L among the even zonals estimated in different Earth's gravity field global solutions from the dedicated GRACE mission are assumed for the uncertainties delta J_L instead of using their covariance sigmas sigma_JL, it turns out that the systematic uncertainty \delta\mu in the Lense-Thirring test with the nodes Omega of LAGEOS and LAGEOS II may be up to 3…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
