Can retired galaxies mimic active galaxies? Clues from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
G. Stasinska (1), N. V. Asari (2, 1), R. Cid Fernandes (2, 1),, J. M. Gomes (2, 1), M. Schlickmann (2), A. Mateus (3), W. Schoenell (2),, L. Sodre Jr. (4) (for the SEAGal collaboration) ((1) LUTH, Observatoire de, Paris, France, (2) UFSC, Brazil

TL;DR
This paper investigates whether many galaxies classified as active are actually 'retired' galaxies with no ongoing star formation, suggesting that apparent nuclear activity may be overestimated due to misclassification.
Contribution
It introduces a method combining stellar population analysis and photoionization models to distinguish retired galaxies from truly active ones in SDSS data.
Findings
A significant fraction of LINER galaxies may be retired galaxies with ionization from old stars.
Observational selection effects influence the apparent shape of the galaxy distribution in diagnostic diagrams.
The prevalence of nuclear activity in galaxies might be overestimated due to misclassification of retired galaxies.
Abstract
The classification of galaxies as star forming or active is generally done in the ([O III]/Hbeta, [N II]/Halpha) plane. The Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) has revealed that, in this plane, the distribution of galaxies looks like the two wings of a seagull. Galaxies in the right wing are referred to as Seyfert/LINERs, leading to the idea that non-stellar activity in galaxies is a very common phenomenon. Here, we argue that a large fraction of the systems in the right wing could actually be galaxies which stopped forming stars. The ionization in these "retired" galaxies would be produced by hot post-AGB stars and white dwarfs. Our argumentation is based on a stellar population analysis of the galaxies via our STARLIGHT code and on photoionization models using the Lyman continuum radiation predicted for this population. The proportion of LINER galaxies that can be explained in such a way…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
