Predictive Hypothesis Identification
Marcus Hutter

TL;DR
This paper introduces a general principle called Predictive Hypothesis Identification (PHI) that unifies various hypothesis evaluation methods in machine learning by focusing on predictive performance, including handling nested hypotheses.
Contribution
The paper proposes PHI as a unifying framework that encompasses existing hypothesis testing and model selection methods, providing a new perspective on predictive inference.
Findings
PHI recovers well-known methods like MAP, ML, MDL, and moment estimation.
PHI can handle nested hypotheses effectively.
PHI offers a unified approach to various hypothesis evaluation techniques.
Abstract
While statistics focusses on hypothesis testing and on estimating (properties of) the true sampling distribution, in machine learning the performance of learning algorithms on future data is the primary issue. In this paper we bridge the gap with a general principle (PHI) that identifies hypotheses with best predictive performance. This includes predictive point and interval estimation, simple and composite hypothesis testing, (mixture) model selection, and others as special cases. For concrete instantiations we will recover well-known methods, variations thereof, and new ones. PHI nicely justifies, reconciles, and blends (a reparametrization invariant variation of) MAP, ML, MDL, and moment estimation. One particular feature of PHI is that it can genuinely deal with nested hypotheses.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference · Control Systems and Identification · Fault Detection and Control Systems
