A Full Year's Chandra Exposure on SDSS Quasars from the Chandra Multiwavelength Project
Paul J. Green (1,2), T. L. Aldcroft (1), G. T. Richards (3), W. A., Barkhouse (4,2), A. Constantin (1), D. Haggard (5), M. Karovska (1), D. -W., Kim (1), M. Kim (6), A. Vikhlinin (1), A. Mossman (1), J. D. Silverman (7),, S. F. Anderson (5), V. Kashyap (1), B. J. Wilkes (1)

TL;DR
This study analyzes a large sample of SDSS quasars observed by Chandra, revealing no evolution in X-ray properties up to redshift 5, and identifying correlations between X-ray and optical characteristics.
Contribution
It provides the first comprehensive analysis of X-ray spectral properties and evolution of SDSS quasars over a broad redshift range using extensive Chandra data.
Findings
No evidence for evolution of X-ray photon index or optical/UV to X-ray flux ratio up to z~5.
Approximately 10% of quasars are obscured, possibly up to one-third considering non-detections.
Gamma hardness correlates with X-ray luminosity and X-ray loudness, indicating increased non-thermal emission.
Abstract
We study the spectral energy distributions and evolution of a large sample of optically selected quasars from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) that were observed in 323 Chandra images analyzed by the Chandra Multiwavelength Project (ChaMP). Our highest-confidence matched sample includes 1135 X-ray detected quasars in the redshift range 0.2<z<5.4, representing some 36Msec of effective exposure. Spectroscopic redshifts are available for about 1/3 of the detected sample; elsewhere, redshifts are estimated photometrically. With 56 z>3 QSOs detected, we find no evidence for evolution out to z~5 for either the X-ray photon index Gamma or for the ratio of optical/UV to X-ray flux alpha_ox. About 10% of detected QSOs are obscured (Nh>1E22), but the fraction might reach ~1/3 if most non-detections are absorbed. We confirm a significant correlation between alpha_ox and optical luminosity, but…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
