Lord Rutherford of Nelson, His 1908 Nobel Prize in Chemistry and Why He Didn't Get a Second Prize
C. Jarlskog

TL;DR
This paper examines Ernest Rutherford's 1908 Nobel Prize in Chemistry, explores why he did not receive a second Nobel, and discusses his scientific opinions and contributions to physics and chemistry.
Contribution
It provides historical context on Rutherford's Nobel recognition and analyzes reasons for the absence of a second Nobel, highlighting his scientific achievements and nominations.
Findings
Rutherford received the 1908 Nobel Prize in Chemistry for his work on radioactive substances.
He was not awarded a second Nobel despite groundbreaking discoveries in physics.
The paper discusses Rutherford's scientific opinions on photon, uncertainty, and atomic energy.
Abstract
"I have dealt with many different transformations with various periods of time, but the quickest that I have met was my own transformation in one moment from a physicist to a chemist." Ernest Rutherford (Nobel Banquet, 1908) This article is about how Ernest Rutherford (1871-1937) got the 1908 Nobel Prize in Chemistry and why he did not get a second Prize for his subsequent outstanding discoveries in physics, specially the discovery of the atomic nucleus and the proton. Who were those who nominated him and who did he nominate for the Nobel Prizes. In order to put the Prize issue into its proper context, I will briefly describe Rutherford's whereabouts. Rutherford, an exceptionally gifted scientist who revolutionized chemistry and physics, was moulded in the finest classical tradition. What were his opinions on some scientific issues such as Einstein's photon, uncertainty…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
