mu-constancy does not imply constant bi-Lipschitz type
Lev Birbrair, Alexandre Fernandes, Walter Neumann

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that constant Milnor number in complex hypersurface singularities does not guarantee constant bi-Lipschitz type, providing a specific counterexample within the Briac con--Speder family.
Contribution
It constructs a family of complex surface germs with constant Milnor number but varying bi-Lipschitz types, challenging previous assumptions.
Findings
Milnor number remains constant across the family.
Bi-Lipschitz type varies despite constant Milnor number.
Counterexample to the equivalence of Milnor number and bi-Lipschitz type.
Abstract
We show that a family of isolated complex hypersurface singularities with constant Milnor number may fail, in the strongest sense, to have constant bi-Lipschitz type. Our example is the Briac con--Speder family of normal complex surface germs; we show the germ is not bi-Lipschitz homeomorphic with respect to the inner metric to the germ for .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory · Geometric and Algebraic Topology · Geometry and complex manifolds
