A High Yield of New Sightlines for the Study of Intergalactic Helium: Far-UV-Bright Quasars from SDSS, GALEX, and HST
David Syphers (1), Scott F. Anderson (1), Wei Zheng (2), Daryl Haggard, (1), Avery Meiksin (3), Kuenley Chiu (4), Craig Hogan (1), Donald P., Schneider (5), Donald G. York (6, 7) ((1) University of Washington, (2), Johns Hopkins, (3) University of Edinburgh

TL;DR
This study significantly expands the sample of high-redshift quasars suitable for intergalactic helium research by cross-matching SDSS and GALEX data, confirming their far-UV brightness with HST, and providing a valuable resource for future cosmological studies.
Contribution
We developed an efficient method to identify far-UV-bright quasars at high redshift, doubling the known sightlines for intergalactic helium studies and enabling more robust cosmological inferences.
Findings
Confirmed 12 far-UV-bright quasars from 24 candidates with HST.
Achieved an order of magnitude higher efficiency than previous searches.
Provided a catalog of hundreds of high-confidence sightlines for future research.
Abstract
Investigations of He II Ly-alpha (304 A rest) absorption toward a half-dozen quasars at z~3-4 have demonstrated the great potential of helium studies of the IGM, but the current critically small sample size of clean sightlines for the He II Gunn-Peterson test limits confidence in cosmological inferences, and a larger sample is required. Although the unobscured quasar sightlines to high redshift are extremely rare, SDSS DR6 provides thousands of z>2.8 quasars. We have cross-correlated these SDSS quasars with GALEX GR2/GR3 to establish a catalog of 200 higher-confidence (~70% secure) cases of quasars at z=2.8-5.1 potentially having surviving far-UV (restframe) flux. We also catalog another 112 likely far-UV-bright quasars from GALEX cross-correlation with other (non-SDSS) quasar compilations. Reconnaissance UV prism observations with HST of 24 of our SDSS/GALEX candidates confirm 12 as…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
