The death of massive stars - I. Observational constraints on the progenitors of type II-P supernovae
S.J. Smartt (1), J.J. Eldridge (2), R.M. Crockett (1), J.R. Maund (3), ((1) Queen's University Belfast; (2) IoA, Cambridge; (3) Dark Cosmology, Centre, Copenhagen)

TL;DR
This study investigates the progenitors of type II-P supernovae through a 10.5-year observational survey, finding that these supernovae originate from red supergiants with initial masses between approximately 8.5 and 16.5 solar masses, highlighting a discrepancy known as the "red supergiant problem."
Contribution
It provides the first comprehensive observational constraints on the mass range of type II-P supernova progenitors using a volume-limited sample and homogeneous analysis methods.
Findings
Minimum progenitor mass for II-P is about 8.5 Msol.
Maximum progenitor mass for II-P is about 16.5 Msol.
Identifies the 'red supergiant problem' in supernova progenitor masses.
Abstract
We present the results of a 10.5 yr, volume limited (28 Mpc) search for supernova (SN) progenitor stars. We compile all SNe discovered within this volume (132, of which 27% are type Ia) and determine the relative rates of each sub-type from literature studies : II-P (59%), Ib/c (29%), IIb (5%), IIn (4%) and II-L (3%). Twenty II-P SNe have high quality optical or near-IR pre-explosion images that allow a meaningful search for the progenitor stars. In five cases they are clearly red supergiants, one case is unconstrained, two fall on compact coeval star clusters and the other twelve have no progenitor detected. We review and update all the available data for the host galaxies (distance, metallicity and extinction) and determine masses and upper mass estimates using the STARS stellar evolutionary code and a single consistent homogeneous method. A maximum likelihood calculation suggests…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
