Comment on "Sizes and relative geoeffectiveness of interplanetary coronal mass ejections and the preceding shock sheaths during intense storms in 1996-2005" by J. Zhang et al
Yu. I. Yermolaev, M. Yu. Yermolaev

TL;DR
This paper critically discusses Zhang et al.'s 2008 statistical analysis of interplanetary coronal mass ejections and shock sheaths, focusing on their sizes and geoeffectiveness during intense geomagnetic storms from 1996 to 2005.
Contribution
It provides a commentary on previous findings, highlighting potential issues and alternative interpretations of the data and conclusions.
Findings
Questions the original interpretation of sheath sizes and geoeffectiveness
Suggests alternative factors influencing geomagnetic storm intensity
Highlights the need for further detailed analysis of ICME properties
Abstract
Recently Zhang et al. [2008] presented a statistical study of sizes and relative geoeffectiveness of ICMEs (bodies of magnetic clouds) and preceding sheaths for 46 events responsible for intense (Dst < -100 nT) geomagnetic storms in 1996-2005 in which only a single ICME was responsible for generating the storm. Here we would like to comment several results and conclusions of this paper.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSolar and Space Plasma Dynamics · Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics · Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
