Objects In Telescope Are Farther Than They Appear: How diffraction tricked Galileo into mismeasuring the distances to the stars
Christopher M. Graney

TL;DR
Galileo's measurements of stellar distances were significantly underestimated because he was misled by diffraction artifacts in his telescope, which affected the apparent sizes of stars he observed.
Contribution
This paper reveals that Galileo's star distance measurements were based on diffraction artifacts, highlighting a historical misconception in early astronomical observations.
Findings
Galileo's star size measurements were affected by diffraction.
Diffraction artifacts led to underestimation of stellar distances.
Historical astronomical data need re-evaluation considering optical effects.
Abstract
Galileo determined distances to stars based on the assumption that stars were suns, the apparent sizes of stars as seen through his telescope, and basic geometry. However, the apparent sizes that he measured were the result of diffraction and not related to the actual sizes of the stars. Galileo's methods and observations were good, but since he was unknowingly observing diffraction artifacts and not the physical bodies of stars he greatly underestimated the distances to the stars.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHistory and Developments in Astronomy · Historical Astronomy and Related Studies · History of Science and Medicine
