The Evolution Of Carbon, Sulphur, and Titanium Isotopes from High-Redshift to the Local Universe
G.L. Hughes (1), B.K. Gibson (1), L. Carigi (1,2), P. Sanchez-Blazquez, (1), J.M.Chavez (3), D.L. Lambert (3) ((1) University of Central Lancashire,, (2) Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, (3) University of Texas)

TL;DR
This study uses galactic chemical evolution models to analyze isotopic patterns of carbon, sulphur, and titanium from high-redshift to the present, challenging some existing assumptions and highlighting the need for model revisions.
Contribution
It provides new insights into isotopic evolution, testing claims about the roles of novae and initial mass functions, and compares model predictions with recent observational data.
Findings
Novae are not necessary for 12C/13C evolution in the solar neighborhood.
A massive star-biased initial mass function fits high-redshift sulphur data but predicts unlikely metallicities.
Titanium isotope predictions do not match observed trends, suggesting model revisions are needed.
Abstract
Recent observations of carbon, sulphur, and titanium isotopes at redshifts z~1 and in the local stellar disc and halo have opened a new window into the study of isotopic abundance patterns and the origin of the chemical elements. Using our Galactic chemical evolution code GEtool, we have examined the evolution of these isotopes within the framework of a Milky Way-like system. We have three aims in this work: first, to test the claim that novae are required, in order to explain the carbon isotope patterns in the Milky Way; second, to test the claim that sulphur isotope patterns at high-redshift require an initial mass function biased towards massive stars; and third, to test extant chemical evolution models against new observations of titanium isotopes that suggest an anti-correlation between trace-to-dominant isotopes with metallicity. Based upon our dual-infall galactic chemical…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
