The nature of faint Spitzer-selected dust-obscured galaxies
Alexandra Pope (1), R. Shane Bussmann (2), Arjun Dey (1), Nicole Meger, (3), David M. Alexander (4), Mark Brodwin (1), Ranga-Ram Chary (5), Mark E., Dickinson (1), David T. Frayer (6), Thomas R. Greve (7), Minh Huynh (6),, Lihwai Lin (8), Glenn Morrison (9, 10)

TL;DR
This study investigates dust-obscured galaxies at z~2 using multi-wavelength data, revealing their star formation properties, luminosities, and potential contribution to cosmic star formation, with implications for future surveys.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed multi-wavelength analysis of Spitzer-selected DOGs, characterizing their nature, star formation rates, and comparison with submillimeter galaxies.
Findings
Most DOGs are star formation dominated (~80%).
Average IR luminosity of DOGs is ~1e12 Lsun.
DOGs contribute about 5-10% to the star formation rate density at z~2.
Abstract
We use deep far-IR, submm, radio and X-ray imaging and mid-IR spectroscopy to explore the nature of a sample of Spitzer-selected dust-obscured galaxies (DOGs) in GOODS-N. A sample of 79 galaxies satisfy the criteria R-[24]>14 (Vega) down to S24>100 microJy. Twelve of these galaxies have IRS spectra available which we use to measure redshifts and classify these objects as being dominated by star formation or active galactic nuclei (AGN) activity in the mid-IR. The IRS spectra and Spitzer photometric redshifts confirm that the DOGs lie in a tight redshift distribution around z~2. Based on mid-IR colors, 80% of DOGs are likely dominated by star formation; the stacked X-ray emission from this sub-sample of DOGs is also consistent with star formation. Since only a small number of DOGs are individually detected at far-IR and submm wavelengths, we use a stacking analysis to determine the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
