Is there an upper limit to black hole masses?
Priyamvada Natarajan, Ezequiel Treister

TL;DR
The paper argues for an upper mass limit of around 10^{10} solar masses for black holes, supported by multiple lines of evidence including galaxy relations, seed black hole predictions, and local mass functions.
Contribution
It presents a comprehensive case for an upper black hole mass limit based on observational, theoretical, and modeling evidence, integrating multi-wavelength data and galaxy evolution models.
Findings
Existence of ultra-massive black holes (UMBHs) is supported by multiple arguments.
An upper mass limit of approximately 10^{10} solar masses is consistent with observations.
The slope of the M_bh-σ relation is predicted to evolve with redshift at high masses.
Abstract
We make a case for the existence for ultra-massive black holes (UMBHs) in the Universe, but argue that there exists a likely upper limit to black hole masses of the order of . We show that there are three strong lines of argument that predicate the existence of UMBHs: (i) expected as a natural extension of the observed black hole mass bulge luminosity relation, when extrapolated to the bulge luminosities of bright central galaxies in clusters; (ii) new predictions for the mass function of seed black holes at high redshifts predict that growth via accretion or merger-induced accretion inevitably leads to the existence of rare UMBHs at late times; (iii) the local mass function of black holes computed from the observed X-ray luminosity functions of active galactic nuclei predict the existence of a high mass tail in the black hole mass function at . Consistency…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
