Are Optically-Selected Quasars Universally X-Ray Luminous? X-Ray/UV Relations in Sloan Digital Sky Survey Quasars
Robert R. Gibson, W. N. Brandt, Donald P. Schneider

TL;DR
This study investigates the X-ray and UV spectral properties of SDSS quasars at redshifts 1.7 to 2.7, finding that X-ray weakness is rare and correlates with specific UV emission line features, challenging the idea of universal X-ray luminosity.
Contribution
It provides the first large-scale analysis of X-ray/UV relations in SDSS quasars, revealing the rarity of X-ray weak quasars and their spectral characteristics.
Findings
X-ray weak quasars are less than 2% of the sample.
X-ray luminosity varies by a factor of 2 over years.
X-ray brightness correlates with UV emission line properties.
Abstract
We analyze archived Chandra and XMM-Newton X-ray observations of 536 Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) Data Release 5 (DR5) quasars (QSOs) at 1.7 <= z <= 2.7 in order to characterize the relative UV and X-ray spectral properties of QSOs that do not have broad UV absorption lines (BALs). We constrain the fraction of X-ray weak, non-BAL QSOs and find that such objects are rare; for example, sources underluminous by a factor of 10 comprise 2% of optically-selected SDSS QSOs. X-ray luminosities vary with respect to UV emission by a factor of 2 over several years for most sources. UV continuum reddening and the presence of narrow-line absorbing systems are not strongly associated with X-ray weakness in our sample. X-ray brightness is significantly correlated with UV emission line properties, so that relatively X-ray weak, non-BAL QSOs generally have weaker, blueshifted…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
