Single-particle spectral function for the classical one-component plasma
Carsten Fortmann

TL;DR
This paper calculates the spectral function of an electron plasma using a self-consistent GW0 approach, introduces a new analytic solution for the self-energy, and demonstrates its accuracy and usefulness for plasma property calculations.
Contribution
A novel non-perturbative analytic solution for the GW0 self-energy as a function of momentum is presented, improving the calculation of spectral functions in correlated plasmas.
Findings
The analytic solution reproduces numerical spectral data with less than 10% error for certain plasma regimes.
The non-perturbative self-energy scales as n^(1/4) at low densities, unlike perturbative results.
The derived formulas accurately predict the chemical potential shift with less than 10% deviation at relevant plasma conditions.
Abstract
The spectral function for an electron one-component plasma is calculated self-consistently using the GW0 approximation for the single-particle self-energy. In this way, correlation effects which go beyond the mean-field description of the plasma are contained, i.e. the collisional damping of single-particle states, the dynamical screening of the interaction and the appearance of collective plasma modes. Secondly, a novel non-perturbative analytic solution for the on-shell GW0 self-energy as a function of momentum is presented. It reproduces the numerical data for the spectral function with a relative error of less than 10% in the regime where the Debye screening parameter is smaller than the inverse Bohr radius, kappa<1/a_B. In the limit of low density, the non-perturbative self-energy behaves as n^(1/4), whereas a perturbation expansion leads to the unphysical result of a density…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
