Post Common Envelope Binaries from SDSS - III. Seven new orbital periods

TL;DR

This study reports new orbital periods for seven post common envelope binary systems from SDSS, highlighting the challenges in identifying such systems and suggesting a decline in their numbers with longer periods, impacting theories of binary evolution.

Contribution

It provides new orbital period measurements for seven PCEBs, demonstrating the limitations of SDSS spectroscopy alone in identifying longer-period systems and implications for common envelope evolution.

Findings

Six orbital periods measured via radial velocities

Detection of one additional period through photometry

Suggests fewer PCEBs with periods >1 day

Abstract

We present follow-up spectroscopy and photometry of 11 post common envelope binary (PCEB) candidates identified from multiple Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) spectroscopy in an earlier paper. Radial velocity measurements using the \Lines{Na}{I}{8183.27,8194.81} absorption doublet were performed for nine of these systems and provided measurements of six orbital periods in the range $\Porb= 2.7-17.4$ h. Three PCEB candidates did not show significant radial velocity variations in the follow-up data, and we discuss the implications for the use of SDSS spectroscopy alone to identify PCEBs. Differential photometry confirmed one of our spectroscopic orbital periods and provided one additional \Porb measurement. Binary parameters are estimated for the seven objects for which we have measured the orbital period and the radial velocity amplitude of the low-mass companion star, $K_\mathrm{sec}$. So far, we have published nine SDSS PCEBs orbital periods, all of them $\Porb<1$ d. We perform Monte-Carlo simulations and show that $3\sigma$ SDSS radial velocity variations should still be detectable for systems in the orbital period range of $\Porb\sim1-10$ days. Consequently, our results suggest that the number of PCEBs decreases considerably for $\Porb>1$ day, and that during the common envelope phase the orbital energy of the binary star is maybe less efficiently used to expell the envelope than frequently assumed.