Does The Addition of a Duration Improve the L_iso - E_peak Relation For Gamma-Ray Bursts?
Andrew C. Collazzi, Bradley E. Schaefer

TL;DR
This study critically evaluates the proposed addition of a duration parameter to the L_iso-E_peak relation for gamma-ray bursts, finding it does not significantly improve the relation's predictive power or scatter.
Contribution
The paper tests and refutes the claimed improvement of the Firmani relation by using independent data and alternative duration measures, showing no significant benefit over existing relations.
Findings
The Firmani relation deteriorates with independent data.
Adding duration does not significantly reduce scatter.
The relation can be derived from existing L_iso-E_peak and Amati relations.
Abstract
Firmani et al. proposed a new Gamma Ray Burst (GRB) luminosity relation that showed a significant improvement over the L_iso-E_peak relation. The new proposed relation simply modifies the E_peak value by multiplying it by a power of T_0.45, where T_0.45 is a particular measure of the GRB duration. We begin by reproducing the results of Firmani for his 19 bursts. We then test the Firmani relation for the same 19 bursts except that we use independently measured values for L_iso, T_0.45, and E_peak, and we find that the relation deteriorates substantially. We further test the relation by using 60 GRBs with measured spectroscopic redshifts, and find a relation that has a comparable scatter as the original L_iso-E_peak relation. That is, a much larger sample of bursts does not reproduce the small scatter as reported by Firmani et al. Finally, we investigate whether the Firmani relation is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGamma-ray bursts and supernovae
