Parkinson's Law Quantified: Three Investigations on Bureaucratic Inefficiency
Peter Klimek, Rudolf Hanel, Stefan Thurner

TL;DR
This paper models three aspects of bureaucratic inefficiency described by Parkinson using socio-physical frameworks, quantifying decision-making, growth, and worker efficiency to better understand and optimize bureaucratic systems.
Contribution
It introduces three novel models that quantify Parkinson's observations on bureaucratic inefficiency within a socio-physical framework.
Findings
Decision bodies become inefficient beyond a critical size (~20 members).
Bureaucratic growth can be controlled under certain conditions.
Optimal retirement timing maximizes overall efficiency.
Abstract
We formulate three famous, descriptive essays of C.N. Parkinson on bureaucratic inefficiency in a quantifiable and dynamical socio-physical framework. In the first model we show how the use of recent opinion formation models for small groups can be used to understand Parkinson's observation that decision making bodies such as cabinets or boards become highly inefficient once their size exceeds a critical 'Coefficient of Inefficiency', typically around 20. A second observation of Parkinson - which is sometimes referred to as Parkinson's Law - is that the growth of bureaucratic or administrative bodies usually goes hand in hand with a drastic decrease of its overall efficiency. In our second model we view a bureaucratic body as a system of a flow of workers, which enter, become promoted to various internal levels within the system over time, and leave the system after having served for a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
