Comparison of Numerical and Post-Newtonian Waveforms for Generic Precessing Black-Hole Binaries
Manuela Campanelli, Carlos O. Lousto, Hiroyuki Nakano, Yosef Zlochower

TL;DR
This paper compares numerical relativity waveforms with post-Newtonian predictions for a precessing black-hole binary, demonstrating high agreement and highlighting the importance of higher PN orders for accurate modeling.
Contribution
It provides the first long-term, fully non-linear simulation of a generic precessing black-hole binary and compares it with advanced post-Newtonian models, revealing insights into waveform accuracy and eccentricity.
Findings
High overlap (~99%) between numerical and 3.5PN waveforms for initial cycles.
3.5PN reduces eccentricity more effectively than 2.5PN.
Phase differences are small and consistent across modes for the first few orbits.
Abstract
We compare waveforms and orbital dynamics from the first long-term, fully non-linear, numerical simulations of a generic black-hole binary configuration with post-Newtonian predictions. The binary has mass ratio q~0.8 with arbitrarily oriented spins of magnitude S_1/m_1^2~0.6 and S_2/m_2^2~0.4 and orbits 9 times prior to merger. The numerical simulation starts with an initial separation of r~11M, with orbital parameters determined by initial 2.5PN and 3.5PN post-Newtonian evolutions of a quasi-circular binary with an initial separation of r=50M. The resulting binaries have very little eccentricity according to the 2.5PN and 3.5PN systems, but show significant eccentricities of e~0.01-0.02 and e~0.002-0.005 in the respective numerical simulations, thus demonstrating that 3.5PN significantly reduces the eccentricity of the binary compared to 2.5PN. We perform three numerical evolutions…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
